Study 2.1: Semantic priming
Code
# Run plot through source() rather than directly in this R Markdown document
# to preserve the italicised text.
source('semanticpriming/frequentist_analysis/semanticpriming-interactions-with-attentional-control.R',
local = TRUE)
include_graphics(
paste0(
getwd(), # Circumvent illegal characters in file path
'/semanticpriming/frequentist_analysis/plots/semanticpriming-interactions-with-attentional-control.pdf'
))
Figure 60: Interactions of attentional control with language-based similarity (panel a) and with visual-strength difference (panel b). Attentional control is constrained to deciles (10 sections) in this plot, whereas in the statistical analysis it contained more values within the current range. n = number of participants contained between deciles.
Code
# Run plot through source() rather than directly in this R Markdown document
# to preserve the italicised text.
source('semanticpriming/frequentist_analysis/semanticpriming-interactions-with-word-concreteness-difference.R',
local = TRUE)
include_graphics(
paste0(
getwd(), # Circumvent illegal characters in file path
'/semanticpriming/frequentist_analysis/plots/semanticpriming-interaction-word-concreteness-difference-SOA.pdf'
))
Figure 61: Interaction between stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) and word-concreteness difference. SOA was analysed using z-scores, but for clarity, the basic labels are used in the legend.
Code
include_graphics(
paste0(
getwd(), # Circumvent illegal characters in file path
'/semanticpriming/frequentist_analysis/plots/semanticpriming-interaction-word-concreteness-difference-vocabulary-size.pdf'
))
Figure 62: Interaction between word-concreteness difference and vocabulary size. Vocabulary size is constrained to deciles in this plot, whereas in the statistical analysis it contained more values within the current range. n = number of participants contained between deciles.
Code
include_graphics(
paste0(
getwd(), # Circumvent illegal characters in file path
'/semanticpriming/frequentist_analysis/plots/semanticpriming-interaction-word-concreteness-difference-gender.pdf'
))
Figure 63: Interaction between word-concreteness difference and gender. Gender was analysed using z-scores, but for clarity, the basic labels are used in the legend. n = number of participants contained between deciles.
Thesis: https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/1795.
Online book created using the R package bookdown.