Modality switches occur early and extend late in conceptual processing: Evidence from ERPs

Ali Qurbi, E. (2022). Ambiguous Word Processing among Second Language Learners. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 78(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr-2020-0115

Amenta, S., Crepaldi, D., & Marelli, M. (2020). Consistency measures individuate dissociating semantic modulations in priming paradigms: A new look on semantics in the processing of (complex) words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(10), 1546–1563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820927663

Amsel, B. D., Kutas, M., & Coulson, S. (2017). Projectors, associators, visual imagery, and the time course of visual processing in grapheme-color synesthesia. Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(4), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2017.1353492

Argiris, G., Rumiati, R. I., & Crepaldi, D. (2021). No fruits without color: Cross-modal priming and EEG reveal different roles for different features across semantic categories. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0234219. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234219

Avramova, Y. R., De Pelsmacker, P., & Dens, N. (2017). Brand placement in text: The short- and long-term effects of placement modality and need for cognition. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 682–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1335041

Bagli, M. (2023). How to Point with Language: English Source-Based Language to Describe Taste Qualities. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 42(2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2023.47.2.31-46

Banks, B., Wingfield, C., & Connell, L. (2021). Linguistic Distributional Knowledge and Sensorimotor Grounding both Contribute to Semantic Category Production. Cognitive Science, 45(10), e13055. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13055

Barros García, B. (2017). In Other Words: Reformulation Strategies in Dostoevskii's Literary Works. Russian Literature, 91, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruslit.2017.09.001

Barsalou, L. W. (2017a). Cognitively Plausible Theories of Concept Composition. In J. A. Hampton & Y. Winter (Eds.), Compositionality and Concepts in Linguistics and Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 9–30). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45977-6_2

Barsalou, L. W. (2017b). What does semantic tiling of the cortex tell us about semantics? Neuropsychologia, 105, 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.011

Barsalou, L. W. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Grounding Cognition. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.116

Bartl, S., & Lahey, E. (2023). ‘As the title implies’: How readers talk about titles in Amazon book reviews. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 32(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470221147788

Baumann, A., Hofmann, K., Marakasova, A., Neidhardt, J., & Wissik, T. (2023). Semantic micro-dynamics as a reflex of occurrence frequency: A semantic networks approach. Cognitive Linguistics, 34(3–4), 533–568. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2022-0008

Bechtold, L., Bellebaum, C., Egan, S., Tettamanti, M., & Ghio, M. (2019). The role of experience for abstract concepts: Expertise modulates the electrophysiological correlates of mathematical word processing. Brain and Language, 188, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.10.002

Bechtold, L., Bellebaum, C., & Ghio, M. (2023). When a Sunny Day Gives You Butterflies: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Concreteness and Context Effects in Semantic Word Processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 35(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01942

Bechtold, L., Bellebaum, C., Hoffman, P., & Ghio, M. (2021). Corroborating behavioral evidence for the interplay of representational richness and semantic control in semantic word processing. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 6184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85711-7

Bidet-Ildei, C., Gimenes, M., Toussaint, L., Almecija, Y., & Badets, A. (2017). Sentence plausibility influences the link between action words and the perception of biological human movements. Psychological Research, 81(4), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0776-z

Bidet-Ildei, C., Gimenes, M., Toussaint, L., Beauprez, S.-A., & Badets, A. (2017). Painful semantic context modulates the relationship between action words and biological movement perception. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(7), 821–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2017.1322093

Bolognesi, M., & Strik Lievers, F. (2020). How language and image construct synaesthetic metaphors in print advertising. Visual Communication, 19(4), 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218782001

Borghesani, V., & Piazza, M. (2017). The neuro-cognitive representations of symbols: The case of concrete words. Neuropsychologia, 105, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.026

Borghi, A. M., & Barsalou, L. (2021). Perspective in the conceptualization of categories. Psychological Research, 85(2), 697–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01269-0

Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000089

Borghi, A. M., Mazzuca, C., Gervasi, A. M., Mannella, F., & Tummolini, L. (2023). Grounded cognition can be multimodal all the way down. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2210238

Bottini, R., Ferraro, S., Nigri, A., Cuccarini, V., Bruzzone, M. G., & Collignon, O. (2020). Brain Regions Involved in Conceptual Retrieval in Sighted and Blind People. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(6), 1009–1025. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01538

Bruffaerts, R., De Deyne, S., Meersmans, K., Liuzzi, A. G., Storms, G., & Vandenberghe, R. (2019). Redefining the resolution of semantic knowledge in the brain: Advances made by the introduction of models of semantics in neuroimaging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 103, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.05.015

Caballero, R., & Paradis, C. (2020). Soundscapes in English and Spanish: A corpus investigation of verb constructions. Language and Cognition, 12(4), 705–728. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2020.19

Caballero, R., & Paradis, C. (2023). Sharing Perceptual Experiences through Language. Journal of Intelligence, 11(7), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11070129

Cantarero, K., Parzuchowski, M., & Dukala, K. (2017). White Lies in Hand: Are Other-Oriented Lies Modified by Hand Gestures? Possibly Not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00814

Carney, J. (2020). Thinking avant la lettre: A Review of 4E Cognition. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 4(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.26613/esic.4.1.172

Caterina Villani & Luisa Lugli. (2020). L'effetto Simon e il suo decorso temporale con stimoli linguistici non spaziali. Giornale italiano di psicologia, 1, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1421/96612

Chan, S. (2022). Dynamics of nominal classification systems in language processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(6), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.2011331

Charmhun Jo, Sun-A Kim, & Chu-Ren Huang. (2022). Linguistic synesthesia in Korean: A compound word-based study of cross-modal directionality. Linguistic Research, 39(2), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.17250/KHISLI.39.2.202206.002

Chedid, G., Brambati, S. M., Bedetti, C., Rey, A. E., Wilson, M. A., & Vallet, G. T. (2019). Visual and auditory perceptual strength norms for 3,596 French nouns and their relationship with other psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2094–2105. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01254-w

Chen, I.-H., Zhao, Q., Long, Y., Lu, Q., & Huang, C.-R. (2019). Mandarin Chinese modality exclusivity norms. PLOS ONE, 14(2), e0211336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211336

Choi, U., Sung, Y., & Ogawa, S. (2020). Measurement of ultra‐fast signal progression related to face processing by 7T fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 41(7), 1754–1764. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24907

Chwilla, D. J. (2022). Context effects in language comprehension: The role of emotional state and attention on semantic and syntactic processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 1014547. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.1014547

Cirillo, G., Strijkers, K., Runnqvist, E., & Baus, C. (2023). Effects of Shared Attention on joint language production across processing stages. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2260021

Cochrane, B. A., & Milliken, B. (2019). Imagined event files: An interplay between imagined and perceived objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 538–544. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01572-2

Connell, L. (2019). What have labels ever done for us? The linguistic shortcut in conceptual processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1308–1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1471512

Connell, L., Lynott, D., & Banks, B. (2018). Interoception: The forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170143. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0143

Corciulo, S., Bioglio, L., Basile, V., Patti, V., & Damiano, R. (2023). The DEEP Sensorium: A multidimensional approach to sensory domain labelling. Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023, 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543873.3587631

Courson, M., Macoir, J., & Tremblay, P. (2018). A facilitating role for the primary motor cortex in action sentence processing. Behavioural Brain Research, 336, 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.09.019

Davis, C. P., Joergensen, G. H., Boddy, P., Dowling, C., & Yee, E. (2020). Making It Harder to “See” Meaning: The More You See Something, the More Its Conceptual Representation Is Susceptible to Visual Interference. Psychological Science, 31(5), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620910748

Davis, C. P., & Yee, E. (2021). Building semantic memory from embodied and distributional language experience. WIREs Cognitive Science, 12(5), e1555. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1555

Davis, J. D., Coulson, S., Arnold, A. J., & Winkielman, P. (2021). Dynamic Grounding of Concepts: Implications for Emotion and Social Cognition. In M. D. Robinson & L. E. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Embodied Psychology (pp. 23–42). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_2

De Deyne, S., Brysbaert, M., & Elgort, I. (2023). Chapter 7. Cross-language influences in L2 semantic and conceptual representation and processing. In I. Elgort, A. Siyanova-Chanturia, & M. Brysbaert (Eds.), Bilingual Processing and Acquisition (Vol. 16, pp. 152–186). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.16.07ded

Dellantonio, S., & Pastore, L. (2017). The ‘Proprioceptive’ Component of Abstract Concepts. In S. Dellantonio & L. Pastore, Internal Perception (Vol. 40, pp. 297–357). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55763-1_6

Díez-Álamo, A. M., Díez, E., Alonso, M. Á., Vargas, C. A., & Fernandez, A. (2018). Normative ratings for perceptual and motor attributes of 750 object concepts in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1632–1644. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0970-y

Dove, G. (2018). Language as a disruptive technology: Abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170135. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0135

Dove, G. (2021). The Challenges of Abstract Concepts. In M. D. Robinson & L. E. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Embodied Psychology (pp. 171–195). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_8

Dove, G., Barca, L., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2022). Words have a weight: Language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts. Psychological Research, 86(8), 2451–2467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6

Dupont, W., Papaxanthis, C., Lebon, F., & Madden-Lombardi, C. (2022). Does the Motor Cortex Want the Full Story? The Influence of Sentence Context on Corticospinal Excitability in Action Language Processing. Neuroscience, 506, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.10.022

Dutriaux, L., Dahiez, X., & Gyselinck, V. (2019). How to change your memory of an object with a posture and a verb. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(5), 1112–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818785096

Dymarska, A., Connell, L., & Banks, B. (2022). Linguistic Bootstrapping Allows More Real-world Object Concepts to Be Held in Mind. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 40171. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.40171

Dymarska, A., Connell, L., & Banks, B. (2023). More is not necessarily better: How different aspects of sensorimotor experience affect recognition memory for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(10), 1572–1587. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001265

Edmiston, P., & Lupyan, G. (2017). Visual interference disrupts visual knowledge. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.002

Elisa Scerrati, Cristina Iani, Luisa Lugli, & Sandro Rubichi. (2019). C'è un effetto di potenziamento dell'azione con oggetti bimanuali? Giornale italiano di psicologia, 4, 987–996. https://doi.org/10.1421/95573

Elpidorou, A., & Dove, G. (2018). Consciousness and Physicalism: A Defense of a Research Program (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682075

Espino, O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2018). Thinking About the Opposite of What Is Said: Counterfactual Conditionals and Symbolic or Alternate Simulations of Negation. Cognitive Science, 42(8), 2459–2501. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12677

Fabrizio Calzavarini. (2023). Comprensione e cervello. Sistemi intelligenti, 2, 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1422/107149

Fischer, J., & Mahon, B. Z. (2021). What tool representation, intuitive physics, and action have in common: The brain's first-person physics engine. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 38(7–8), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2022.2106126

Galetzka, C. (2017). The Story So Far: How Embodied Cognition Advances Our Understanding of Meaning-Making. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01315

Gálvez-García, G., Aldunate, N., Bascour-Sandoval, C., Martínez-Molina, A., Peña, J., & Barramuño, M. (2020). Muscle activation in semantic processing: An electromyography approach. Biological Psychology, 152, 107881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107881

Gao, C., Baucom, L. B., Kim, J., Wang, J., Wedell, D. H., & Shinkareva, S. V. (2019). Distinguishing abstract from concrete concepts in supramodal brain regions. Neuropsychologia, 131, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.032

Gatti, D., Marelli, M., Vecchi, T., & Rinaldi, L. (2022). Spatial Representations Without Spatial Computations. Psychological Science, 33(11), 1947–1958. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221094863

Gijssels, T., & Casasanto, D. (2020). Hand-use norms for Dutch and English manual action verbs: Implicit measures from a pantomime task. Behavior Research Methods, 52(4), 1744–1767. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01347-x

Grand, G., Blank, I. A., Pereira, F., & Fedorenko, E. (2022). Semantic projection recovers rich human knowledge of multiple object features from word embeddings. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(7), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01316-8

Grant, L. D., & Weissman, D. H. (2023). The binary structure of event files generalizes to abstract features: A nonhierarchical explanation of task set boundaries for the congruency sequence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(7), 1033–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001148

Greco, A. (2021). Spatial and Motor Aspects in the “Action-Sentence Compatibility Effect.” Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 647899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647899

Guerra, E., & Knoeferle, P. (2018). Semantic Interference and Facilitation: Understanding the Integration of Spatial Distance and Conceptual Similarity During Sentence Reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00718

Günther, F., Petilli, M. A., Vergallito, A., & Marelli, M. (2022). Images of the unseen: Extrapolating visual representations for abstract and concrete words in a data-driven computational model. Psychological Research, 86(8), 2512–2532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01429-7

Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019). Vector-Space Models of Semantic Representation From a Cognitive Perspective: A Discussion of Common Misconceptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 1006–1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619861372

Hafri, A., Trueswell, J. C., & Strickland, B. (2018). Encoding of event roles from visual scenes is rapid, spontaneous, and interacts with higher-level visual processing. Cognition, 175, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.011

Hardy, B. W. (2021). Embodied Cognition in Communication Science. Communication Theory, 31(4), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa003

Harpaintner, M., Sim, E.-J., Trumpp, N. M., Ulrich, M., & Kiefer, M. (2020). The grounding of abstract concepts in the motor and visual system: An fMRI study. Cortex, 124, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.10.014

Harpaintner, M., Trumpp, N. M., & Kiefer, M. (2018). The Semantic Content of Abstract Concepts: A Property Listing Study of 296 Abstract Words. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01748

Harpaintner, M., Trumpp, N. M., & Kiefer, M. (2022). Time course of brain activity during the processing of motor- and vision-related abstract concepts: Flexibility and task dependency. Psychological Research, 86(8), 2560–2582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01374-5

Hartman, J., & Paradis, C. (2023). The language of sound: Events and meaning multitasking of words. Cognitive Linguistics, 34(3–4), 445–477. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2022-0006

Hauk, O., Giraud, A.-L., & Clarke, A. (2017). Brain oscillations in language comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 533–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1297842

Hauk, O., Jackson, R. L., & Rahimi, S. (2023). Transforming the neuroscience of language: Estimating pattern-to-pattern transformations of brain activity. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2226268

Hauk, O., Magnabosco, F., & Law, R. (2023). Can we separate semantic representations from computations? A commentary on Calzavarini (2023). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2226269

Heim, E. M. (2017a). Adoption in Galatians and Romans: Contemporary Metaphor Theories and the Pauline Huiothesia Metaphors. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004339873

Heim, E. M. (2017b). Adoption in Galatians and Romans: Contemporary Metaphor Theories and the Pauline Huiothesia Metaphors. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004339873

Hoeben Mannaert, L. N., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2020). Object combination in mental simulations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), 1796–1806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820933214

Hoffman, P., McClelland, J. L., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2018). Concepts, control, and context: A connectionist account of normal and disordered semantic cognition. Psychological Review, 125(3), 293–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000094

Hohol, M. (2019). Foundations of Geometric Cognition (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056291

Holman, A., & Gîrbă, A. (2019). The match in orientation between verbal context and object accelerates change detection. Psihologija, 52(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI180412033H

Hörberg, T., Larsson, M., & Olofsson, J. K. (2022). The Semantic Organization of the English Odor Vocabulary. Cognitive Science, 46(11), e13205. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13205

Huang, C.-R., & Xiong, J. (2019). Linguistic synaesthesia in Chinese. In C.-R. Huang, Z. Jing-Schmidt, & B. Meisterernst (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Applied Linguistics (1st ed., pp. 294–312). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625157-20

Iatropoulos, G., Herman, P., Lansner, A., Karlgren, J., Larsson, M., & Olofsson, J. K. (2018). The language of smell: Connecting linguistic and psychophysical properties of odor descriptors. Cognition, 178, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.007

Iriguchi, M., Fujimura, R., Koda, H., & Masataka, N. (2019). Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0214281. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214281

Jo, C. (2022). Linguistic Synesthesia in Korean: Universality and Variation. SAGE Open, 12(3), 215824402211178. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221117804

Johns, B. T. (2022). Accounting for item-level variance in recognition memory: Comparing word frequency and contextual diversity. Memory & Cognition, 50(5), 1013–1032. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01249-z

Jones, L. L., Wurm, L. H., Calcaterra, R. D., & Ofen, N. (2017). Integrative Priming of Compositional and Locative Relations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00359

Julich-Warpakowski, N., & Pérez Sobrino, P. (2023). Introduction: Current challenges in metaphor research. Metaphor and the Social World, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00026.jul

Kabbach, A., & Herbelot, A. (2021). Avoiding Conflict: When Speaker Coordination Does Not Require Conceptual Agreement. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 523920. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.523920

Kaiser, E. (2021). Consequences of Sensory Modality for Perspective-Taking: Comparing Visual, Olfactory and Gustatory Perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 701486. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701486

Kaup, B., Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K. M., Bryce, D., Butz, M. V., Dignath, D., Dudschig, C., Franz, V. H., Friedrich, C., Gawrilow, C., Heller, J., Huff, M., Hütter, M., Janczyk, M., Leuthold, H., Mallot, H., Nürk, H.-C., Ramscar, M., Said, N., … Wong, H. Y. (2023). Modal and amodal cognition: An overarching principle in various domains of psychology. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w

Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2017). The perceptual and phenomenal capacity of mental imagery. Cognition, 162, 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.004

Kernot, D., Bossomaier, T., & Bradbury, R. (2017). Novel Text Analysis for Investigating Personality: Identifying the Dark Lady in Shakespeare's Sonnets. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 24(4), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1304049

Kernot, D., Bossomaier, T., & Bradbury, R. (2018). Using Shakespeare's Sotto Voce to Determine True Identity From Text. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00289

Kernot, D., Bossomaier, T., & Bradbury, R. (2019). The Stylometric Impacts of Ageing and Life Events on Identity. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 26(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1405719

Keus, K., & Harde, R. (2022). “She Wished Someone Would Help Them”: PTSD and Empathy in the Six of Crows Duology. Children's Literature in Education, 53(1), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-021-09441-0

Khatin-Zadeh, O., Hu, J., Banaruee, H., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2023). How emotions are metaphorically embodied: Measuring hand and head action strengths of typical emotional states. Cognition and Emotion, 37(3), 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2023.2181314

Kim, M.-K., Müller, H. M., & Weiss, S. (2021). What you “mean” is not what I “mean”: Categorization of verbs by Germans and Koreans using the semantic differential. Lingua, 252, 103012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103012

Klomberg, B., Schilhab, T., & Burke, M. (2022). Picturing Fiction through Embodied Cognition: Drawn Representations and Viewpoint in Literary Texts (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003225300

Knoeferle, P. (2019). Predicting (variability of) context effects in language comprehension. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 3(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-019-00025-5

Koblet, O., & Purves, R. S. (2020). From online texts to Landscape Character Assessment: Collecting and analysing first-person landscape perception computationally. Landscape and Urban Planning, 197, 103757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103757

Kompa, N. A. (2021). Language and embodiment—Or the cognitive benefits of abstract representations. Mind & Language, 36(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12266

Kompa, N. A., & Mueller, J. L. (2022). Inner speech as a cognitive tool—Or what is the point of talking to oneself? Philosophical Psychology, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2112164

Körner, A., Castillo, M., Drijvers, L., Fischer, M. H., Günther, F., Marelli, M., Platonova, O., Rinaldi, L., Shaki, S., Trujillo, J. P., Tsaregorodtseva, O., & Glenberg, A. M. (2023). Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper. Journal of Cognition, 6(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.231

Krishna, P. P., Arulmozi, S., & Mishra, R. K. (2022). “Do You See and Hear More? A Study on Telugu Perception Verbs.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(3), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09827-7

Kuhnke, P., Beaupain, M. C., Arola, J., Kiefer, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2023). Meta-analytic evidence for a novel hierarchical model of conceptual processing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 144, 104994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104994

Kuhnke, P., Kiefer, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2021). Task-Dependent Functional and Effective Connectivity during Conceptual Processing. Cerebral Cortex, 31(7), 3475–3493. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab026

Kumcu, A. (2021). Linguistic Synesthesia in Turkish: A Corpus-based Study of Crossmodal Directionality. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(4), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1921557

Lai, V. T., Hubbard, R., Ku, L.-C., & Pfeifer, V. (2023). Electrophysiology of Non-Literal Language. In M. Grimaldi, E. Brattico, & Y. Shtyrov (Eds.), Language Electrified (Vol. 202, pp. 613–646). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3263-5_19

Landrigan, J.-F., & Mirman, D. (2018). The cost of switching between taxonomic and thematic semantics. Memory & Cognition, 46(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0757-5

Large, A.-C., Bach, C., & Calvet, G. (2018). CONTACT: A Human Centered Approach of Multimodal Flight Deck Design and Evaluation. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (Vol. 10906, pp. 593–604). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91122-9_48

Lee, J., & Shin, J.-A. (2023). The cross-linguistic comparison of perceptual strength norms for Korean, English and L2 English. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1188909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1188909

Li, M., Lu, Q., Long, Y., & Gui, L. (2017). Inferring Affective Meanings of Words from Word Embedding. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 8(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2017.2723012

Lin, K., & Chan, S. (2019). When senses meet functions: An amodal stage in conceptual processing. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2018.1560299

Littlemore, J. (2019). Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241441

Liu, S., Zhou, M., & Li, Y. (2019). Internet use experience influence individuals’ lexical decision performance by changing their body representation. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.021

Liu, W., Bansal, D., Daruna, A., & Chernova, S. (2023). Learning instance-level N-ary semantic knowledge at scale for robots operating in everyday environments. Autonomous Robots, 47(5), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-023-10099-4

Liu, W., Bansal, D., Daruna, A., & Chernova, S. (2021, July 12). Learning Instance-Level N-Ary Semantic Knowledge At Scale For Robots Operating in Everyday Environments. Robotics: Science and Systems XVII. Robotics: Science and Systems 2021. https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2021.XVII.035

Long, Y., Xiang, R., Lu, Q., Huang, C.-R., & Li, M. (2021). Improving Attention Model Based on Cognition Grounded Data for Sentiment Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 12(4), 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2019.2903056

Louwerse, M. M. (2018). Knowing the Meaning of a Word by the Linguistic and Perceptual Company It Keeps. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12349

Lupyan, G., & Winter, B. (2018). Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren't languages more iconic? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170137. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0137

Lynott, D., Connell, L., Brysbaert, M., Brand, J., & Carney, J. (2020). The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: Multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 1271–1291. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z

Lynott, D., Walsh, M., McEnery, T., Connell, L., Cross, L., & O'Brien, K. (2019). Are You What You Read? Predicting Implicit Attitudes to Immigration Based on Linguistic Distributional Cues From Newspaper Readership; A Pre-registered Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00842

Malhi, S. K., & Buchanan, L. (2018). A test of the symbol interdependency hypothesis with both concrete and abstract stimuli. PLOS ONE, 13(3), e0192719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192719

Mangels, J. A., Rodriguez, S., Ochakovskaya, Y., & Guerra-Carrillo, B. (2017). Achievement Goal Task Framing and Fit With Personal Goals Modulate the Neurocognitive Response to Corrective Feedback. AERA Open, 3(3), 233285841772087. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417720875

Marchetti, R., Vaugoyeau, M., Colé, P., & Assaiante, C. (2022). A sensorimotor representation impairment in dyslexic adults: A specific profile of comorbidity. Neuropsychologia, 165, 108134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108134

Marmeleira, J., & Duarte Santos, G. (2019). Do Not Neglect the Body and Action: The Emergence of Embodiment Approaches to Understanding Human Development. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 126(3), 410–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512519834389

Marson, F., Paoletti, P., Naor-Ziv, R., Carducci, F., & Ben-Soussan, T. D. (2023). Embodied empathy and abstract concepts’ concreteness: Evidence from contemplative practices. In Progress in Brain Research (Vol. 277, pp. 181–209). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.12.005

Márton, Z. C., Türker, S., Rink, C., Brucker, M., Kriegel, S., Bodenmüller, T., & Riedel, S. (2018). Improving object orientation estimates by considering multiple viewpoints: Orientation histograms of symmetries and measurement models for view selection. Autonomous Robots, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-017-9633-1

McRae, K., Nedjadrasul, D., Pau, R., Lo, B. P., & King, L. (2018). Abstract Concepts and Pictures of Real‐World Situations Activate One Another. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12328

Meng, X., Sun, C., Du, B., Liu, L., Zhang, Y., Dong, Q., Georgiou, G. K., & Nan, Y. (2022). The development of brain rhythms at rest and its impact on vocabulary acquisition. Developmental Science, 25(2), e13157. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13157

Miceli, A., Wauthia, E., Kandana Arachchige, K., Lefebvre, L., Ris, L., & Simoes Loureiro, I. (2023). Perceptual strength influences lexical decision in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 68, 101144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2023.101144

Miceli, A., Wauthia, E., Lefebvre, L., Ris, L., & Simoes Loureiro, I. (2021). Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 667271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667271

Miceli, A., Wauthia, E., Lefebvre, L., Vallet, G. T., Ris, L., & Loureiro, I. S. (2022). Differences related to aging in sensorimotor knowledge: Investigation of perceptual strength and body object interaction. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 102, 104715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104715

Miklashevsky, A. (2018). Perceptual Experience Norms for 506 Russian Nouns: Modality Rating, Spatial Localization, Manipulability, Imageability and Other Variables. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(3), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9548-1

Miller, J., Brookie, K., Wales, S., Wallace, S., & Kaup, B. (2018). Embodied cognition: Is activation of the motor cortex essential for understanding action verbs? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(3), 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000451

Minervino, R. A., Martín, A., Tavernini, L. M., & Trench, M. (2018). The Understanding of Visual Metaphors by the Congenitally Blind. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01242

Moretti, S., & Greco, A. (2018). Truth is in the head. A nod and shake compatibility effect. Acta Psychologica, 185, 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.010

Moretti, S., & Greco, A. (2020). Nodding and shaking of the head as simulated approach and avoidance responses. Acta Psychologica, 203, 102988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102988

Morucci, P., Bottini, R., & Crepaldi, D. (2019). Augmented Modality Exclusivity Norms for Concrete and Abstract Italian Property Words. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.88

Mueller, C. J., White, C. N., & Kuchinke, L. (2017). Electrophysiological correlates of the drift diffusion model in visual word recognition. Human Brain Mapping, 38(11), 5616–5627. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23753

Muraki, E. J., Doyle, A., Protzner, A. B., & Pexman, P. M. (2023). Context matters: How do task demands modulate the recruitment of sensorimotor information during language processing? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 976954. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.976954

Muraki, E. J., Speed, L. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2023). Insights into embodied cognition and mental imagery from aphantasia. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(10), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00221-9

Okuno, H. Y., & Guedes, G. (2020). Automatic XML creation for Multisensorial Books. 2020 XV Conferencia Latinoamericana de Tecnologias de Aprendizaje (LACLO), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO50806.2020.9381139

Ostarek, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2017). Reading sky and seeing a cloud: On the relevance of events for perceptual simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(4), 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000318

Pecher, D. (2018). Curb Your Embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12311

Pérez-Gay Juárez, F., Labrecque, D., & Frak, V. (2019). Assessing language-induced motor activity through Event Related Potentials and the Grip Force Sensor, an exploratory study. Brain and Cognition, 135, 103572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.010

Pérez-Sánchez, M. Á., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., Guasch, M., Hinojosa, J. A., Fraga, I., Marín, J., & Ferré, P. (2021). EmoPro – Emotional prototypicality for 1286 Spanish words: Relationships with affective and psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods, 53(5), 1857–1875. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01519-9

Perfecto, H., Galak, J., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2017). Rejecting a bad option feels like choosing a good one. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(5), 659–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000092

Perlman, M., Little, H., Thompson, B., & Thompson, R. L. (2018). Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1433. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01433

Pexman, P. M. (2019). The role of embodiment in conceptual development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1274–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1303522

Pexman, P. M., Muraki, E., Sidhu, D. M., Siakaluk, P. D., & Yap, M. J. (2019). Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body–object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 51(2), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1171-z

Piai, V., & Zheng, X. (2019). Speaking waves: Neuronal oscillations in language production. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 71, pp. 265–302). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2019.07.002

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Simonenko, M. A., Kazaryan, S. Y., & Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. (2023). Synaesthetic metaphor and its reproduction in Russian-to-English translation: A frame-based study. RESEARCH RESULT Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-3-0-2

Popović Stijačić, M., & Filipović Đurđević, D. (2022). Perceptual richness of words and its role in free and cued recall. Primenjena Psihologija, 15(3), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.v15i3.2400

Pulvermüller, F. (2018a). Neural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication. Progress in Neurobiology, 160, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.07.001

Pulvermüller, F. (2018b). Neurobiological Mechanisms for Semantic Feature Extraction and Conceptual Flexibility. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 590–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12367

Purves, R. S., Striedl, P., Kong, I., & Majid, A. (2023). Conceptualizing Landscapes Through Language: The Role of Native Language and Expertise in the Representation of Waterbody Related Terms. Topics in Cognitive Science, 15(3), 560–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12652

Radvansky, G. A. (2017). Human Memory (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542768

Radvansky, G. A. (2021). Human Memory (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429287039

Rahimi, S., Farahibozorg, S.-R., Jackson, R., & Hauk, O. (2022). Task modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics in semantic brain networks: An EEG/MEG study. NeuroImage, 246, 118768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118768

Raia, R. (2023). An analysis of conceptual ambiguities in the debate on the format of concepts. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-023-09938-7

Raj, R., Hörberg, T., Lindroos, R., Larsson, M., Herman, P., Laukka, E. J., & Olofsson, J. K. (2023). Odor identification errors reveal cognitive aspects of age-associated smell loss. Cognition, 236, 105445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105445

Reggin, L. D., Gómez Franco, L. E., Horchak, O. V., Labrecque, D., Lana, N., Rio, L., & Vigliocco, G. (2023). Consensus Paper: Situated and Embodied Language Acquisition. Journal of Cognition, 6(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.308

Repetto, C., Rodella, C., Conca, F., Santi, G. C., & Catricalà, E. (2022). The Italian Sensorimotor Norms: Perception and action strength measures for 959 words. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02004-1

Rey, A. E., Riou, B., Vallet, G. T., & Versace, R. (2017). The automatic visual simulation of words: A memory reactivated mask slows down conceptual access. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 71(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000100

Reymore, L. (2022). Characterizing prototypical musical instrument timbres with timbre trait profiles. Musicae Scientiae, 26(3), 648–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649211001523

Robinson, M. D., Fetterman, A. K., Meier, B. P., Persich, M. R., & Waters, M. R. (2021). Embodied Perspectives on Personality. In M. D. Robinson & L. E. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Embodied Psychology (pp. 477–498). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_21

Robinson, M. D., & Thomas, L. E. (2021). Introduction to Embodied Psychology: Thinking, Feeling, and Acting. In M. D. Robinson & L. E. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Embodied Psychology (pp. 1–19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_1

San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., & Majid, A. (2018). Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0034

Scerrati, E., D'Ascenzo, S., Nicoletti, R., Villani, C., & Lugli, L. (2022). Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming Task. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 901730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901730

Scerrati, E., Iani, C., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Rubichi, S. (2020). Do my hands prime your hands? The hand-to-response correspondence effect. Acta Psychologica, 203, 103012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103012

Scerrati, E., Iani, C., & Rubichi, S. (2021). Does the Activation of Motor Information Affect Semantic Processing? In L. Bechberger, K.-U. Kühnberger, & M. Liu (Eds.), Concepts in Action (Vol. 9, pp. 153–166). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69823-2_7

Scerrati, E., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2017). The Multilevel Modality-Switch Effect: What Happens When We See the Bees Buzzing and Hear the Diamonds Glistening. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 798–803. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1150-2

Scherer, D., & Wentura, D. (2018). Combining the Post-Cue Task and the Perceptual Identification Task to Assess Parallel Activation and Mutual Facilitation of Related Primes and Targets. Experimental Psychology, 65(2), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000396

Schilhab, T. (2017). Derived Embodiment in Abstract Language. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56056-4

Schulte Im Walde, S., & Frassinelli, D. (2022). Distributional Measures of Semantic Abstraction. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 796756. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.796756

Seghier, M. L. (2023). Multiple functions of the angular gyrus at high temporal resolution. Brain Structure and Function, 228(1), 7–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02512-y

Šetić Beg, M. (2021). Uloga utjelovljenja u razumijevanju pojmova. Psihologijske Teme, 30(2), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.30.2.12

Shen, G., Wang, R., Yang, M., & Xie, J. (2022). Chinese Children with Congenital and Acquired Blindness Represent Concrete Concepts in Vertical Space through Tactile Perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 11055. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711055

Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2018). Lonely sensational icons: Semantic neighbourhood density, sensory experience and iconicity. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1358379

Speed, L. J., & Brybaert, M. (2022). Dutch sensory modality norms. Behavior Research Methods, 54(3), 1306–1318. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01656-9

Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2017). Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space. Behavior Research Methods, 49(6), 2204–2218. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0852-3

Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2018). An Exception to Mental Simulation: No Evidence for Embodied Odor Language. Cognitive Science, 42(4), 1146–1178. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12593

Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2020). Grounding language in the neglected senses of touch, taste, and smell. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(5–6), 363–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2019.1623188

Speed, L. J., Papies, E. K., & Majid, A. (2023). Mental simulation across sensory modalities predicts attractiveness of food concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 29(3), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000461

Sri-Ganeshan, M. (2021). Modality Effect. In M. Raz & P. Pouryahya (Eds.), Decision Making in Emergency Medicine (pp. 215–220). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0143-9_34

Strik Lievers, F., & Winter, B. (2018). Sensory language across lexical categories. Lingua, 204, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.11.002

Su, C., Wang, X., Wang, Z., & Chen, Y. (2019). A model of synesthetic metaphor interpretation based on cross-modality similarity. Computer Speech & Language, 58, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2019.03.003

Szychowska, M., & Wiens, S. (2021). Visual load effects on the auditory steady-state responses to 20-, 40-, and 80-Hz amplitude-modulated tones. Physiology & Behavior, 228, 113240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113240

Tarai, S., Bit, A., Kumar, R., & Savekar, A. (2021). Processing of party symbols and names predicts the results of 2019 Indian parliamentary election: Analysing psycholinguistic behavioural incongruency effects. Psychology of Language and Communication, 25(1), 264–295. https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2021-0012

Tatiya, G., Hosseini, R., Hughes, M. C., & Sinapov, J. (2019). Sensorimotor Cross-Behavior Knowledge Transfer for Grounded Category Recognition. 2019 Joint IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2019.8850715

Tatiya, G., Hosseini, R., Hughes, M. C., & Sinapov, J. (2020). A Framework for Sensorimotor Cross-Perception and Cross-Behavior Knowledge Transfer for Object Categorization. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 522141. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.522141

Tatiya, G., & Sinapov, J. (2019). Deep Multi-Sensory Object Category Recognition Using Interactive Behavioral Exploration. 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 7872–7878. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.8794095

Teodorescu, H.-N., & Bolea, S. C. (2019). Text Sectioning based on Stylometric Distances. 2019 International Conference on Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogue (SpeD), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPED.2019.8906616

Thomason, J., Padmakumar, A., Sinapov, J., Walker, N., Jiang, Y., Yedidsion, H., Hart, J., Stone, P., & Mooney, R. (2020). Jointly Improving Parsing and Perception for Natural Language Commands through Human-Robot Dialog. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 67, 327–374. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11485

Tillman, R., & Louwerse, M. (2018). Estimating Emotions Through Language Statistics and Embodied Cognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9522-y

Tjuka, A., Forkel, R., & List, J.-M. (2021). Linking norms, ratings, and relations of words and concepts across multiple language varieties. Behavior Research Methods, 54(2), 864–884. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01650-1

Tomsk State University, Vladimirova, V. E., Rezanova, Z. I., Tomsk State University, Korshunova, I. S., & Tomsk State University. (2022). Ethno-linguistic contact as reflected in language cognition: Does bilingualism affect subjective assessments of perceptual semantics?*. Rusin, 70, 214–231. https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/70/12

Utsumi, A. (2020). Exploring What Is Encoded in Distributional Word Vectors: A Neurobiologically Motivated Analysis. Cognitive Science, 44(6), e12844. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12844

Valenzuela, J. (2017). Meaning in English: An Introduction (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316156278

Van De Weijer, J., Bianchi, I., & Paradis, C. (2023). Sensory modality profiles of antonyms. Language and Cognition, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.20

Vergallito, A., Petilli, M. A., & Marelli, M. (2020). Perceptual modality norms for 1,121 Italian words: A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks. Behavior Research Methods, 52(4), 1599–1616. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01337-8

Verheyen, S., De Deyne, S., Linsen, S., & Storms, G. (2020). Lexicosemantic, affective, and distributional norms for 1,000 Dutch adjectives. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 1108–1121. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01303-4

Vigliocco, G., Zhang, Y., Del Maschio, N., Todd, R., & Tuomainen, J. (2020). Electrophysiological signatures of English onomatopoeia. Language and Cognition, 12(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.38

Volfart, A., Rice, G. E., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rossion, B. (2021). Implicit, automatic semantic word categorisation in the left occipito-temporal cortex as revealed by fast periodic visual stimulation. NeuroImage, 238, 118228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118228

W, D., C, P., C, M.-L., & F, L. (2023). Imagining and reading actions: Towards similar motor representations. Heliyon, 9(2), e13426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13426

Wajnerman Paz, A. (2018). A Defense of an Amodal Number System. Philosophies, 3(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020013

Wajnerman Paz, A. (2019). Using neural response properties to draw the distinction between modal and amodal representations. Philosophical Psychology, 32(3), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2018.1563677

Wajnerman-Paz, A., & Rojas-Líbano, D. (2022). On the role of contextual factors in cognitive neuroscience experiments: A mechanistic approach. Synthese, 200(5), 402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03870-0

Wan, M., Su, Q., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C.-R. (2023). Perceptional and actional enrichment for metaphor detection with sensorimotor norms. Natural Language Engineering, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135132492300044X

Wang, L., Chen, Q., Chen, Y., & Zhong, R. (2019). The Effect of Sweet Taste on Romantic Semantic Processing: An ERP Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1573. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01573

Wang, Y., & Zeng, Y. (2022a). Multisensory Concept Learning Framework Based on Spiking Neural Networks. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 16, 845177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.845177

Wang, Y., & Zeng, Y. (2022b). Statistical Analysis of Multisensory and Text-Derived Representations on Concept Learning. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 16, 861265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.861265

Wassenburg, S. I., De Koning, B. B., De Vries, M. H., Boonstra, A. M., & Van Der Schoot, M. (2017). Gender differences in mental simulation during sentence and word processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(3), 274–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12066

Wentura, D. (2019). Cognition and emotion: On paradigms and metaphors. Cognition and Emotion, 33(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1567464

Wingfield, C., & Connell, L. (2022a). Sensorimotor distance: A grounded measure of semantic similarity for 800 million concept pairs. Behavior Research Methods, 55(7), 3416–3432. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01965-7

Wingfield, C., & Connell, L. (2022b). Understanding the role of linguistic distributional knowledge in cognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(10), 1220–1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2069278

Winter, A., Dudschig, C., Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Kaup, B. (2022). The action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE): Meta-analysis of a benchmark finding for embodiment. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103712

Winter, B. (2019). Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165547

Winter, B. (2022). Mapping the landscape of exploratory and confirmatory data analysis in linguistics. In D. Tay & M. X. Pan (Eds.), Data Analytics in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 13–48). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110687279-002

Winter, B. (2023). Abstract concepts and emotion: Cross-linguistic evidence and arguments against affective embodiment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1870), 20210368. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0368

Winter, B., Fischer, M. H., Scheepers, C., & Myachykov, A. (2023). More is Better: English Language Statistics are Biased Toward Addition. Cognitive Science, 47(4), e13254. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13254

Winter, B., Perlman, M., & Majid, A. (2018). Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage. Cognition, 179, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.008

Winter, B., Perlman, M., Perry, L. K., & Lupyan, G. (2017). Which words are most iconic?: Iconicity in English sensory words. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 18(3), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18.3.07win

Winter, B., Sóskuthy, M., Perlman, M., & Dingemanse, M. (2022). Trilled /r/ is associated with roughness, linking sound and touch across spoken languages. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1035. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04311-7

Winter, B., & Strik-Lievers, F. (2023). Semantic distance predicts metaphoricity and creativity judgments in synesthetic metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World, 13(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00029.win

Wu, C., & Mu, X. (2023). Sensory experience ratings (SERs) for 1,130 Chinese words: Relationships with other semantic and lexical psycholinguistic variables. Linguistics Vanguard, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0083

Xiong, J., & Huang, C.-R. (2018). Somewhere in COLDNESS Lies Nibbāna: Lexical Manifestations of COLDNESS. In J.-F. Hong, Q. Su, & J.-S. Wu (Eds.), Chinese Lexical Semantics (Vol. 11173, pp. 70–81). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04015-4_6

Xu, Y., Vignali, L., Sigismondi, F., Crepaldi, D., Bottini, R., & Collignon, O. (2023). Similar object shape representation encoded in the inferolateral occipitotemporal cortex of sighted and early blind people. PLOS Biology, 21(7), e3001930. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001930

Yan, J., Li, W., Zhang, T., Zhang, J., Jin, Z., & Li, L. (2023). Structural and functional neural substrates underlying the concreteness effect. Brain Structure and Function, 228(6), 1493–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-023-02668-1

Yasuda, M., Stins, J. F., & Higuchi, T. (2017). Effect of Constrained Arm Posture on the Processing of Action Verbs. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00057

Yin Zhong, & Chu-Ren Huang. (2020). Sweetness or Mouthfeel: A corpus-based study of the conceptualization of taste. Linguistic Research, 37(3), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.001

Zappa, A., Mestre, D., Pergandi, J.-M., Bolger, D., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2022). Cross-linguistic gender congruency effects during lexical access in novice L2 learners: Evidence from ERPs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(9), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2039726

Zeng, Y., Zhao, D., Zhao, F., Shen, G., Dong, Y., Lu, E., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y., Liang, Q., Zhao, Y., Zhao, Z., Fang, H., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Liu, X., Du, C., Kong, Q., Ruan, Z., & Bi, W. (2023). BrainCog: A spiking neural network based, brain-inspired cognitive intelligence engine for brain-inspired AI and brain simulation. Patterns, 4(8), 100789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100789

Zhang, M., Wu, X., & Wang, A. (2021). Crossmodal Nonspatial Repetition Inhibition Due to Modality Shift. Perception, 50(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006620988209

Zhang, X., Amiri, S., Sinapov, J., Thomason, J., Stone, P., & Zhang, S. (2023). Multimodal embodied attribute learning by robots for object-centric action policies. Autonomous Robots, 47(5), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-023-10098-5

Zhang, X., Sinapov, J., & Zhang, S. (2021, July 12). Planning Multimodal Exploratory Actions for Online Robot Attribute Learning. Robotics: Science and Systems XVII. Robotics: Science and Systems 2021. https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2021.XVII.005

Zhang, Y., Mirman, D., & Hoffman, P. (2023). Taxonomic and thematic relations rely on different types of semantic features: Evidence from an fMRI meta-analysis and a semantic priming study. Brain and Language, 242, 105287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105287

Zhao, Q. (2020a). From Linguistic Synaesthesia to Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In Q. Zhao, Embodied Conceptualization or Neural Realization (Vol. 10, pp. 115–128). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9315-1_7

Zhao, Q. (2020b). Methodology: A Corpus-Driven Approach. In Q. Zhao, Embodied Conceptualization or Neural Realization (Vol. 10, pp. 19–34). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9315-1_2

Zhao, Q., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C.-R. (2022). Linguistic synesthesia is metaphorical: A lexical-conceptual account. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(3), 553–583. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0098

Zhao, Q., Huang, C.-R., & Ahrens, K. (2019). Directionality of linguistic synesthesia in Mandarin: A corpus-based study. Lingua, 232, 102744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102744

Zhao, Q., & Long, Y. (2022). A Diachronic Study on Linguistic Synesthesia in Chinese. In M. Dong, Y. Gu, & J.-F. Hong (Eds.), Chinese Lexical Semantics (Vol. 13250, pp. 84–94). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06547-7_6

Zhao, Q., Long, Y., & Huang, C.-R. (2020). Linguistic Synaesthesia of Mandarin Sensory Adjectives: Corpus-Based and Experimental Approaches. In J.-F. Hong, Y. Zhang, & P. Liu (Eds.), Chinese Lexical Semantics (Vol. 11831, pp. 139–146). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38189-9_14

Zhao, T., Huang, Y., Chen, D., Jiao, L., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Wang, R., & Xie, J. (2020). The modality switching costs of Chinese–English bilinguals in the processing of L1 and L2. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(3), 396–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819878089

Zhong, J., Peniak, M., Tani, J., Ogata, T., & Cangelosi, A. (2019). Sensorimotor input as a language generalisation tool: A neurorobotics model for generation and generalisation of noun-verb combinations with sensorimotor inputs. Autonomous Robots, 43(5), 1271–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-018-9793-7

Zhong, Y., Huang, C.-R., & Dong, S. (2022). Bodily sensation and embodiment: A corpus-based study of gustatory vocabulary in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 50(1), 196–230. https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2022.0008

Zhong, Y., Wan, M., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C.-R. (2022). Sensorimotor norms for Chinese nouns and their relationship with orthographic and semantic variables. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(8), 1000–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2035416

Zhu, S., Wang, X., & Liu, P. (2021). Who Killed Sanmao and Virginia Woolf? A Comparative Study of Writers with Suicidal Attempt Based on a Quantitative Linguistic Method. In M. Liu, C. Kit, & Q. Su (Eds.), Chinese Lexical Semantics (Vol. 12278, pp. 408–420). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81197-6_34

Гарах, Ж. В., Ребрейкина, А. Б., Стрелец, В. Б., Голикова, А. В., & Зайцева, Ю. С. (2019). НЕЙРОФИЗИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ МЕХАНИЗМЫ ЧТЕНИЯ. Журнал высшей нервной деятельности им И П Павлова, 69(3), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0044467719030055