Skip to contents

Not every design has to be written as code. The repository carries a Shiny front-end over this package which drives the whole workflow through a browser tab, from choosing a paradigm to downloading the stimuli, the realised-control report and the materials datasheet. It is a front-end and nothing more. Every number it shows comes from the installed lexsync package, never from a re-implementation, and the design it assembles is an ordinary YAML file that you can save, share and run from a script afterwards.

This article describes the app without running it, since the app needs a live server, so the code below is shown but not evaluated.

Launching it

The app is not part of the package. It lives in the repository, under apps/r_shiny, beside the corpora and the example item tables that it reads, so launch it from a clone. The interface needs shiny, bslib and DT, and the downloads need zip. All four are listed in the package’s Suggests.

install.packages(c("shiny", "bslib", "DT", "zip"))
shiny::runApp("apps/r_shiny", port = 8502)

Run that from the root of the clone. The app looks for corpora/derived/ in the working directory and then in the two directories above it, and it finds the example item tables under items/ the same way, so a launch from somewhere else leaves it with no lexicon to offer. It opens at http://127.0.0.1:8502.

The repository also carries a launcher for the terminal, which takes an optional port and is what a container or a headless session should use.

Rscript apps/r_shiny/run.R          # 8502 unless a port is given
Rscript apps/r_shiny/run.R 8600

The launcher fixes the host and the port and never opens a browser itself. A server started with an auto-launched browser or an unbound port can exit the moment it is backgrounded, which is the usual reason an app appears not to stay up in an automated environment.

The sidebar

Whatever the paradigm, the same few fields sit in the sidebar. ‘Paradigm’ chooses between a factorial word contrast drawn from a corpus, lexical decision with generated pseudowords, priming and self-paced reading, the last two reading prepared items from a table. ‘Design name’ and ‘Language label’ become the slug that every written file is named after, exactly as in a design file, so my_design plus english gives my_design_english_stimuli_R.csv and its companions. ‘Stimulus font’ overrides the presentation font, which matters for a non-Latin script, and it reaches the design only when it differs from the Courier New default, leaving the schema in charge otherwise.

Under those the sidebar prints the version of lexsync that is running, with the reminder that the app runs the installed package. If that line disagrees with the version you expect, the app is reading a different install.

Describing the design

The main panel changes with the paradigm, since a corpus-matched contrast and a prepared item table need different things.

A factorial word contrast

‘Lexicon’ lists the derived corpora the clone holds under corpora/derived/, which are English, English screened against SUBTLEX-US (en_v2, described in vignette("matching-and-designs")), Spanish, a Spanish lexicon carrying grammatical gender, and Mandarin Chinese. Two sliders then narrow the lexicon to the candidate pool the design will consider at all, one for length in letters or characters and one for frequency in Zipf. They are the design’s pool_filters, and they are a step that matters, because matching never re-reads them.

The app opens on en_v2, the lexicon the shipped English designs use. A lexicon with a nonstandard column, such as en_v2, also brings a ‘Screened forms only’ checkbox, ticked from the start. It adds nonstandard: [0, 0] to the pool filters and so keeps only the forms the screen leaves unmarked. Clearing it lets the marked forms, such as names and acronyms, back into the pool.

The conditions are an editable table. Each row names a condition and carves it out of the pool, either by a numeric window through the dimension, lower and upper columns or by a set of comma-separated values through categories, which is what a categorical column such as the gender of the Spanish lexicon needs. The optional dimension2, lower2 and upper2 columns add a second factor to the same row, so one row can define a full cell of a 2 × 2. Three presets fill the table in one click, a high versus low frequency contrast, a dense versus sparse neighbourhood contrast and a 2 × 2 of frequency by neighbourhood. A preset also sets the matched dimensions and the matching method that suit it, so the neighbourhood contrast arrives matched on length and frequency by the joint method and the 2 × 2 arrives matched on length alone. Every control stays editable afterwards, so a preset is only a starting point.

Below the table sit the choices that govern the match itself. ‘Items per condition’ sets how many stimuli each condition should hold. ‘Matching method’ offers the four the engine implements, standardised_euclidean, joint, mahalanobis and optimal, and the note beneath it says that the last two agree only closely between the engines. ‘Resampled disjoint sets’ draws several matched sets that share no item, which is what lets items be treated as a random factor, and zero switches it off. ‘Match on’ picks the dimensions to equate across conditions, from length, frequency, neighbourhood N, OLD20, syllable count and bigram frequency. A warning appears beneath it when it names a dimension whose windows differ between conditions, because matching on a dimension the conditions manipulate works against the contrast they define. A window that every condition shares only narrows the pool and draws no warning. With nothing chosen, the app says so and keeps ‘Run design’ disabled. ‘Counterbalancing lists’ sets how many lists the items are rotated across.

The advanced panel underneath holds one tolerance window per matched dimension, the half-width in standard deviations of the band a candidate must fall inside. It is closed by default because the schema already carries a sensible default for every dimension, and a zero there leaves that default alone, where you might expect it to pin the window to nothing. Reproducing the exact window of a published study is the usual reason to touch the panel at all, and the panel itself gives the worked example that Matching, dimensions and designs discusses, a frequency k of 0.111 for a band of the mean plus or minus a ninth of a standard deviation.

Lexical decision

A lexical-decision design takes the same lexicon and pool filters and then asks only for the number of items per condition, words and pseudowords being equal in number, and for the generator. letter_substitution, the engine default, changes as few single letters as it can while keeping every bigram attested. subsyllabic swaps whole onset, nucleus and coda constituents in the manner of Wuggy (Keuleers & Brysbaert, 2010). Both are deterministic, so the pseudowords are the same ones the package would generate from a script.

Priming and self-paced reading

These two paradigms read prepared items instead of selecting any, so no corpus and no matching are involved. The app uses the bundled example table for the paradigm, items/priming_pairs_en.csv or items/spr_sentences_en.csv, and asks only how many counterbalancing lists to build.

Running it

‘Run design’ assembles the design and lays out a temporary folder the way the download will be laid out. The design goes in under the name the ‘Reproducible code’ tab gives it, with the schema that ships inside the package at config/schema.yaml and the lexicon or item table at the path the design names. The app then makes the exported call there, run_pipeline("<name>.yaml", schema_path = "config/schema.yaml", outdir = "output"). The run therefore reads only relative paths, and its datasheet checksums the files the bundle holds. The working directory moves to the folder for that call alone, which is safe because R serves every session on one thread. The button stays disabled while a factorial design has nothing to match on. Two conditions are checked first, that a lexicon has been chosen where the paradigm needs one and that a factorial design defines at least two conditions, and anything the pipeline itself refuses comes back as the error the pipeline raised, in its own words. A successful run reports how many rows were selected and opens the results.

Reading the results

The results arrive as six tabs, which between them cover what was selected, whether it is any good, what it will present and how to reproduce it.

‘Stimuli’ is the selected set as a table, the same one the run wrote to disk.

‘Realised control’ is the part that decides whether the set is usable. It covers every pair of conditions on every dimension the report includes. Each row gives the dimension’s role (manipulated, controlled or uncontrolled), the raw difference, Cohen’s d with its confidence interval, the variance ratio and the verdict of the two one-sided tests procedure. The interval matches the tests at the schema’s alpha, covering 100(1 - 2 alpha) per cent, and its heading takes that level from the run’s datasheet, so it reads 90% at the default alpha of .05. The tab then draws the absolute standardised mean difference per dimension and pair as a bar chart with a dashed line at 0.5 standard deviations. Manipulated dimensions stand well above that line and matched ones sit near zero, so the chart shows immediately whether the matching worked. An uncontrolled dimension that stands high is a difference the design did not hold. The per-condition descriptive statistics follow underneath. A design drawn from an item table produces no corpus-matching report, and the tab says as much where an empty table would otherwise sit.

‘Datasheet’ renders the materials datasheet for the run, carrying the provenance of the corpus, the checksums, the realised control and the pre-registration skeleton.

‘Experiment scripts’ offers one download per presentation target, each compiled from the same trial description. The PsychoPy download is a zip archive holding the script and the conditions file it loads from its own folder. The OpenSesame download is a zip archive holding the .osexp, one per counterbalancing version when the design has several, with the loop and text tables each one reads. Unzip either and run the experiment from the folder it makes. The jsPsych page carries its trials and runs in a browser as it stands.

‘Reproducible code’ is what stops a session in the app from being a dead end. It shows the design configuration as YAML, with repository-relative paths such as corpora/derived/en.csv, the same paths the run read, followed by the one-line R, Python and command-line calls that reproduce the same operation. Saving the YAML under the name the panel gives it and running any of those three lines repeats the run outside the app. The command lines quote the design file’s name, and their quoting holds in bash, cmd.exe and PowerShell. The sentence under them is taken from the datasheet’s cross-engine record. Under the deterministic methods it says that the two engines select byte-identical stimuli and trial order, and under mahalanobis and optimal that they select equivalent but not byte-identical stimuli.

‘Download’ archives the folder the run ran in, under the design’s name. It holds the design, the schema at config/schema.yaml, the lexicon or item table at the path the design names and every output under output/. The outputs are the stimuli, the reports, the datasheet, the run log and the three experiments. The datasheet inside records the checksum of the design file beside it and no path outside the folder. Running the exported R call, or its Rscript form, in the unzipped folder repeats the run. It rewrites every output with the same bytes, apart from the run logs, which record when they were written. The Python lines write the Python engine’s files beside them.

What you leave with

A session in the app ends with the same artefacts a scripted run produces, which is why it was built as a front-end over the package and not as a tool of its own. The design YAML is portable across both engines, so a set assembled here can be reproduced by a collaborator working in Python, byte for byte under the deterministic matching methods. Reproducibility, parity and the materials datasheet covers what that guarantee promises and where it stops, and Matching, dimensions and designs reads the realised-control report column by column.